ry blood flow. J Am Coll Cadiol, 1996, 27(5):1519-1526. 5 Beppu S, Matsuda H, Shishido T, et al. Prolonged myocardial contrast echocardiography via peripheral venous adfministration of QW3600 injection (EchoGen):its efficacy and effects. J Am Coc Echo, 1997, 10(1):11-17.
6 Schneider M, Arditi M, Barrau MB, et al. BRI:a new ultrasonographic contrast agent based on sulfur hexafluoride-filed microbubbles. Invest Radiol, 1995, 30(8):451-459.
7 谢峰, 勒斌, 李澎, 等. 新型声学造影剂非损伤性估价正常心肌血流灌注的实验研究. 中国超声医学杂志, 1996, 12(1):1-5.
8 Linka A, Ates G, Wei K, et al. Redistribution after reperfusion:a novel property of IP201, a new deposit microbubble, clinical implication. Circulation, 1997, 96(8):Ⅰ-11-16.
9 Jucquois I, Nihoyannopoulos P, DHondt AM, et al. Detection echocardiography with NC100100 and transient response second hamonic imaging in patients with previous myocardial infarction:comparison with Ec99m MIBI single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation, 1997, 96(8):Ⅰ-31-37.
10 Bums PN. Harmonic imaging with ultrasound contrast agents. Clin Radiol, 1996, 51(supp1):50-60.
11 Percher H, Dupouy P, Duval Moulin AM, et al. Improvement of subendocardial myocardial perfusion after percutanueous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A myocardial contrast echocardiography study with correlation between myocardial contrast reserve and Doppler coronary resve. Circulation, 1995, 91:1491.
12 Camarano G, Kagosta M, Gimple LW, et al. Identification of viable myocardium with contrast echocardiography in patients with poor left ventricular systolic function caused by recent of remote myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol, 1995, 75:215-219.
13 Cheirif J, Narkiewicz Jodko JB, Hawkins HK, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography:relation of collateral perfusion to extent of injury and severity of contractlie dysfunction in a canine model of coronary thrombosis and reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1995, 26:237-241.
14
上一页 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 下一页